[…] wishes of the military, the CIA and most of his foreign service, was breathtakingly ambitious and dangerous. Douglass shows the pre-assassination workings of the CIA to frame Oswald for the shooting. His thesis is virtually irresistible but there’s a major anomaly he doesn’t cover. The creation of the Oswald-as-pro-Castro-lefty operation was very complex, with […]
[PDF file]: […] his head above the parapet? It is taken for granted by Shenon from page one that there are two immutable and incontestable facts about the assassination: 1) Oswald shot JFK, 2) Oswald shot Tippit.1 These are so manifest to Shenon that he scarcely bothers to discuss them. (Why bother when you’ve got stellar eyewitnesses […]
[…] on the liberal-left. But 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination are subjects on which people feel free to comment without reading any of the material. Snowdon’s description of Oswald as ‘a Marxist’ tells us he’s read nothing. As for 9/11, on the day it happened I was watching the traffic on a couple of conspiracy-oriented […]
[…] on the liberal-left. But 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination are subjects on which people feel free to comment without reading any of the material. Snowdon’s description of Oswald as ‘a Marxist’ tells us he’s read nothing. As for 9/11, on the day it happened I was watching the traffic on a couple of conspiracy-oriented […]
[…] Morley’s initial reaction to the JFK documents recently declassified.18 Morley was referring to the revelation that head of CIA counterintelligence (CI), James Angleton, began collecting reports on Oswald in 1959. A week or so later Morley wrote: ‘The new JFK files yield clear and convincing evidence of CIA responsibility for JFK’s assassination . . […]
[…] on the liberal-left. But 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination are subjects on which people feel free to comment without reading any of the material. Snowdon’s description of Oswald as ‘a Marxist’ tells us he’s read nothing. As for 9/11, on the day it happened I was watching the traffic on a couple of conspiracy-oriented […]
[…] Morley’s initial reaction to the JFK documents recently declassified.1 Morley was referring to the revelation that head of CIA counterintelligence (CI), James Angleton, began collecting reports on Oswald in 1959. A week or so later Morley wrote: ‘The new JFK files yield clear and convincing evidence of CIA responsibility for JFK’s assassination . . […]
[…] on the liberal-left. But 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination are subjects on which people feel free to comment without reading any of the material. Snowdon’s description of Oswald as ‘a Marxist’ tells us he’s read nothing. As for 9/11, on the day it happened I was watching the traffic on a couple of conspiracy-oriented […]
[…] on the liberal-left. But 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination are subjects on which people feel free to comment without reading any of the material. Snowdon’s description of Oswald as ‘a Marxist’ tells us he’s read nothing. As for 9/11, on the day it happened I was watching the traffic on a couple of conspiracy-oriented […]
[PDF file]: […] IV.b.3, ‘Forensic Anthropological Issues’ paragraphs 611-659 (‘Comparison of photographs of Joseph Milteer with that of an unidentified Dallas motorcade spectator’). See or . 8 Briefly: Lee Harvey Oswald visited the Dallas FBI office prior to the assassination, and left a short handwritten letter. After the assassination, when Oswald’s letter was rediscovered, Dallas FBI Agent […]
