Lobster Issue 59 (Summer 2010)
FREE
[PDF file]: […] into JFK’s assassination, where they do a version of the standard historians’ body swerve round the subject: ‘The almost-certain assassin, a troubled former marine named Lee Harvey Oswald . . .’ (p. 227). Similarly they are carefully sceptical and non-committal about JFK and Vietnam: ‘. . . over time became increasingly sceptical about South […]
Lobster Issue 75 (Summer 2018)
FREE
[PDF file]: […] of the Fascists and Nazis who are mentioned in the text. The book begins by attacking two myths. The first is another piece of selfserving deception by Oswald Mosley, who claimed that he had definitely not instructed his storm troopers to obstruct the British war effort. This comes from the text of one of […]
Lobster Issue 74 (Winter 2017)
FREE
[PDF file]: […] Warren Commission was an inquiry into who shot Kennedy. It wasn’t: the conclusion was preordained. The Warren Commission hired some young lawyers to make the case against Oswald. They duly cherry-picked evidence and rewrote eyewitness testimony where it was inconvenient. But they were still left with a ballistics scenario in which the wounds of […]
Lobster Issue 75 (Summer 2018)
FREE
[PDF file]: The View from the Bridge Robin Ramsay Thanks to Nick Must (in particular) and Garrick Alder for editorial and proof-reading assistance with this issue. * new * The higher bullshit There has been more well-intentioned nonsense written by academics about the assassination of JFK than any other subject I have looked at. A classic of […]
Lobster Issue 61 (Summer 2011)
FREE
[PDF file]: […] his spelling and lack of grammatical knowledge. Mackenzie’s version of the events in Dallas can be summarised thus: everybody was involved – mob, military, anti-Castro Cubans, FBI, Oswald and Ruby, LBJ, ‘Mac’ Wallace….but not, apparently, the CIA. The CIA are almost entirely missing from this story. It’s the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) Mackenzie writes […]
Lobster Issue 61 (Summer 2011)
FREE
[PDF file]: […] the McCarthy period. So far so unexceptional. But when we start moving through the sixties towards the present day, it all goes off the rails. Once again Oswald, Sirhan and Ray are presented as the assassins of the Kennedys and King. None of the more substantial research which suggests they were innocent is even […]