[PDF file]: […] Hamilton 68 merely a passing reference.25 And the fact that Hamilton 68 got it wrong says nothing about Russian influence operations in the US. . AI on JFK again So, why not? I tried out the new AI search app ChatGPT. I asked it ‘Who was Chauncey Holt?’ And in about 5 seconds it […]
[PDF file]: […] on his show the actor George Lazenby (who played James Bond in just one film, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service). Lazenby offered his theory of who assassinated JFK. I was reminded of all this when scrolling through a discussion of Lazenby and the assassination on John Simkin’s Education Forum site.10 Said discussion is interesting […]
[PDF file]: […] about Kennedy’s assassination, he replied ‘A mansion has many rooms. I’m not privy to who struck John.’ 9 Yes, both comments could be interpreted as references to JFK but ‘who struck John’ or ‘who shot John’ are phrases going back a long way, in some reports back to the 19th century. For example, there […]
[…] for the British military to revive ‘stay behind’ groups. ‘This is not a nothing-burger . . .’ . . . was Jefferson Morley’s initial reaction to the JFK documents recently declassified.18 Morley was referring to the revelation that head of CIA counterintelligence (CI), James Angleton, began collecting reports on Oswald in 1959. A week […]
[…] Must for help with the production of Lobster. *new* ‘This is not a nothing-burger . . .’ . . . was Jefferson Morley’s initial reaction to the JFK documents recently declassified.1 Morley was referring to the revelation that head of CIA counterintelligence (CI), James Angleton, began collecting reports on Oswald in 1959. A week […]
[PDF file]: […] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[…] community. My guess would be that Hunt was blanked because he named LBJ as being part of the conspiracy and LBJ-dunnit remains unthinkable for most of the JFK researchers.19 In the case of Holt, in so far as they are aware of Holt at all, JFK researchers believe that Holt’s claims were refuted by […]
[…] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[…] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[PDF file]: […] community. My guess would be that Hunt was blanked because he named LBJ as being part of the conspiracy and LBJ-dunnit remains unthinkable for most of the JFK researchers.19 In the case of Holt, in so far as they are aware of Holt at all, JFK researchers believe that Holt’s claims were refuted by […]
[…] that *new* Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
