[…] Warren Commission was an inquiry into who shot Kennedy. It wasn’t: the conclusion was preordained. The Warren Commission hired some young lawyers to make the case against Oswald. They duly cherry-picked evidence and rewrote eyewitness testimony where it was inconvenient. But they were still left with a ballistics scenario in which the wounds of […]
[PDF file]: […] Coudenhove-Kalergi’s authoritarian leadership (‘Napoleonic desires for dictatorship’) and by the mid-20s was running his own rival organization. Of greater note were Karl Haushofer,6 a family friend, and Oswald Spengler. Haushofer was teaching political geography at Munich University Many eminent Austro-Hungarians did likewise, including Sigmund Freud who stated of Wilson in the 20s: ‘As far […]
[PDF file]: […] 61 spelling and lack of grammatical knowledge. Mackenzie’s version of the events in Dallas can be summarised thus: everybody was involved – mob, military, anti-Castro Cubans, FBI, Oswald and Ruby, LBJ, ‘Mac’ Wallace….but not, apparently, the CIA. The CIA are almost entirely missing from this story. It’s the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) Mackenzie writes […]
[PDF file]: […] Page 94 Summer 2011 Lobster 61 unexceptional. But when we start moving through the sixties towards the present day, it all goes off the rails. Once again Oswald, Sirhan and Ray are presented as the assassins of the Kennedys and King. None of the more substantial research which suggests they were innocent is even […]
