In the ramblings by this non-scientist in this field since I blundered into it in 1989, there have been two themes: e-m technology is dangerous and the bastards are lying to us about this; and the claims of mind control victims might be true because the technology may exist. Thus, in the first category, we have recently had ‘Worry over incubator “emissions” ’:
‘Electromagnetic fields from incubators may be interfering with new-born babies’ heart rates, claim researchers. The Archives of Disease in Childhood study found normal changes in heart rate were reduced when the machines were turned on.’(1)
And we have had (among many similar): ‘Mobile phones may raise cancer risk in children, study finds children and teenagers are five times more likely to get brain cancer if they use mobile phones, a new study suggests.’
‘Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden, told a conference that the risk of a cancer in the cells which support the central nervous system is dramatically increased in people who start using mobiles before the age of 20.’(2)
The second theme, on mind control technology, is now getting complicated.(3) On the one hand we have recently had the headline in the New Scientist, ‘Microwave ray gun controls crowds with noise’:
‘The device – dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) – exploits the micro-wave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds…..’(4)
Which, at one level, is the cat out of the bag: microwave-induced ‘recognisable sounds’ is a short step from microwave-induced voices, which is what Harlan Girard was talking of in 1989 when I first met him.
And there’s this from AP, ‘Guess what? Military funds mind-reading science’:
‘Here’s a mind-bending idea: The U.S. military is paying scientists to study ways to read people’s thoughts…
…….. Armed with a $4 million grant from the Army, scientists are studying brain signals to try to decipher what a person is thinking and to whom the person wants to direct the message. The project is a collaboration among researchers at the University of California, Irvine; Carnegie Mellon University; and the University of Maryland.’(5)
But these stories raise one obvious problem: if what the mind control victims are saying is true, the US military/intelligence has had much more advanced technology than this since the late 1980s, when the ‘hearing voices’ phenomenon first appeared.(6) The ‘microwave audio effect’, for example, mentioned above in the New Scientist piece, dates back to 1961. If what the victims claim is true, why is the US military going down a road it has been down already? (7) Is it a case of one hand (among the many attached to the Pentagon) not knowing what the others have done? Or are these new research projects a kind of cover story to enable them to ‘discover’ something they have already? Or are the research project to be used as evidence that they aren’t doing what the victims claim?
The puzzle is deepened by information from John Allman. In a letter to Dr. Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, Allman wrote in May this year:
‘I have just spoken on the telephone to the webmaster at Fort Leavenworth, Clayton Robertson, who has told me that the entry on V2K [Voice to Skull] devices on the CALL Military Thesaurus is one of those entries that has recently been removed permanently …….the removal of this entry coincides in time with a professional and concerted effort – and so far a successful effort – on the part of our lobby in the USA to awaken Congressional interest in the topic of V2K devices. It also comes hot on the heels of the publication online by our lobby of the recently declassified Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons report (which remained Secret NOFORN during most of the years since I first began lobbying against V2K devices or writing to you), including that report’s publication on www.slavery.org.uk/ science.htm.’(8)
Is the removal of the V2K entry merely a coincidence? And if not, why try to conceal on the one hand what you are publicly commissioning research into on the other?
Notes
- <news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7375050.stm>
This is interesting to me because my father died of lymph system cancer and he slept for many years under an electric blanket which would have created an em field. I wonder if he slowly cooked himself to death….. Try Googling ‘electric blankets + cancer’…… - <www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/health/3042340/Mobile-phones-may-raise-cancer-risk-in-children-study-finds.html>
Googling ‘mobile phones + cancer’ got me more than 7 million hits. Changing the search to ‘cell phones + cancer’ got me more than 6 million. - See ‘A Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations & Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons’ by Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton at <www.globalresearch.ca/> for a general introduction to this the subject.
- <http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise.html>
- <http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080816/D92J2JVG1.html>
- See for example the account – one of many similar – at <www.mindcontrolvictim.blogspot.com/2007/09/john-finch_25.html> The symptoms he describes there are reported by many of the victims.
- I believe some of the claims of some of the victims, though I would find it to hard to explain why I discriminated between them.
- The original US military thesaurus entry for V2K can be read at </www.slavery.org.uk/V2Kweapons.jpg>, though as Allman reminds Aftergood, ‘the V2K thesaurus entry webpage had been constructed in such a fashion as to disable copy-to-clipboard functionality whilst it was being displayed on any client computer.’