The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay My thanks to Garrick Alder and Nick Must for help with the production of Lobster. *new* Asil Nadir: the cover-up continues Asil Nadir’s death hit the media on 11 February. None of the obituaries which I have read strayed beyond the conventional line.1 The Times had a full […]
The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay My thanks to Garrick Alder and Nick Must for help with the production of Lobster. *new* ‘Intelligence’ you call it? On Quora there are interesting posts by one Thierry Etienne Joseph Rotty, who describes himself as having been a member of Central Planning at NATO.1 Thus far no-one […]
The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay *new* IRD Rory Cormac is one of the British academics working on the Information Research Department (IRD), now that some of its official files are open to inspection.1 Cormac recently wrote an essay with the provocative title ‘In defence of the Information Research Department’.2 He writes: At its […]
The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay *new* IRD Rory Cormac is one of the British academics working on the Information Research Department (IRD), now that some of its official files are open to inspection.1 Cormac recently wrote an essay with the provocative title ‘In defence of the Information Research Department’.2 He writes: At its […]
[…] officials who might be professionally suspicious? And of all the US government agencies, why chose the DEA? The whole thing was amateurish – and inexplicable. This is Mossad? The only explanation which makes any sense is that the ‘art students’ thing was meant to be blown and was a kind of cover for something […]
[…] officials who might be professionally suspicious? And of all the US government agencies, why chose the DEA? The whole thing was amateurish – and inexplicable. This is Mossad? The only explanation which makes any sense is that the ‘art students’ thing was meant to be blown and was a kind of cover for something […]
[…] officials who might be professionally suspicious? And of all the US government agencies, why chose the DEA? The whole thing was amateurish – and inexplicable. This is Mossad? The only explanation which makes any sense is that the ‘art students’ thing was meant to be blown and was a kind of cover for something […]
[…] officials who might be professionally suspicious? And of all the US government agencies, why chose the DEA? The whole thing was amateurish – and inexplicable. This is Mossad? The only explanation which makes any sense is that the ‘art students’ thing was meant to be blown and was a kind of cover for something […]
[…] officials who might be professionally suspicious? And of all the US government agencies, why chose the DEA? The whole thing was amateurish – and inexplicable. This is Mossad? The only explanation which makes any sense is that the ‘art students’ thing was meant to be blown and was a kind of cover for something […]
